Exploring Ridley Scott’s ‘Napoleon’: A Visual Tapestry of Historical Grandeur

The film “Napoleon,” directed by Ridley Scott, is a visual masterpiece that pays homage to the great masters of art through its breathtaking frames, adorned with warmth and jewel tones. Each scene, whether showcasing the grandeur of six meticulously mounted battle sequences or capturing quieter, intimate moments or the tumultuous scenes of the Reign of Terror, stands as a bonafide work of art thanks to Scott’s collaboration with cinematographer Dariusz Wolski.

Despite the film’s visual splendor, there’s an underlying sense of missed opportunities amidst all the glamour and eye-catching cinematography. While Scott seems to intend to craft a reverential portrayal of Napoleon Bonaparte, there’s a notable absence of crucial aspects of Napoleon’s life, such as his administrative reforms and military strategies, often depicted more as luck than deliberate planning. This omission might be seen as a nod to Napoleon’s preference for luck over tactical brilliance.

Furthermore, the film lacks a nuanced retelling of Napoleon’s life, sidestepping discussions around his harsh policies towards detractors, conquered territories, the reintroduction of slavery, and other controversial aspects.

The narrative commences dramatically with Marie-Antoinette’s harrowing walk to the gallows, observed by a young Napoleon Bonaparte, portrayed by Joaquin Phoenix, an ambitious soldier. The story swiftly progresses through Napoleon’s early successes, his infatuation with Joséphine (Vanessa Kirby), their marriage, and subsequent personal and political conflicts leading to divorce due to Joséphine’s inability to produce an heir.

Phoenix delivers a commendable portrayal of Napoleon, showcasing a somewhat rounded image of the ambitious Corsican leader despite limited material. Vanessa Kirby’s portrayal of Joséphine is captivating, depicting a fiery yet composed character whose love, when unfulfilled at home, extends outward to conquer the world.

The supporting cast, including Tahar Rahim as Paul Barras, Ben Miles as Caulaincourt, Matthew Needham as Lucien, Édouard Philipponnat as Alexander, and Rupert Everett as Arthur Wellesley, add vibrancy to the narrative but fall short in providing substantial depth to their roles.

Scott mentions a director’s cut of the film, extending to four hours and 10 minutes, implying an abundance of additional content that would have delved deeper into Napoleon’s life. Despite this, the film excels in offering viewers painterly frames, gripping battle sequences, and a sense of disappointment at the inability to explore this extraordinary life in greater detail.

In essence, Ridley Scott’s “Napoleon” impresses with its visual allure and performances, yet leaves a longing for a more comprehensive exploration of Napoleon’s multifaceted life beyond its aesthetic splendor.

About the author